teachers

Effective Communication of School District Goals

AdminLeave a comment

Do you know, without a doubt, what your district’s core goals and initiatives are for this school year?

After 31 years in education, I can finally say that I do, and so does every single teacher in our district. That isn’t to say we didn’t have goals in previous years; we certainly did. But like many educators, I was often unclear on what they actually were, or how they were supposed to shape my daily work in the classroom.

Living in California, the beginning of August signals our return to work. Our annual district orientation took place this week. We are also in the midst of some organizational shifts: navigating a potential unification with our local high school district, welcoming a new interim superintendent, and preparing for an upcoming math curriculum pilot.

When our new Interim Superintendent took the mic for her welcoming presentation, she included a single slide that clearly outlined our district focus (three core areas) alongside three manageable initiatives. Many of these build directly on the work we started in the last two years, making the vision feel focused rather than overwhelming.

It was deeply refreshing for me. Just as teachers are expected to post learning targets on the board so students know where they are headed, a district must clearly communicate its target destination to its staff.

Years ago, I had a candid conversation with a former district administrator about this very issue. I remember stating that I didn’t know what our district goals were, and that generic phrases like “raising test scores” didn’t qualify as a real goal in my book; it was far too broad and detached from daily practice. The administrator acknowledged that while goals existed, leadership had done a poor job communicating them. Unfortunately, despite that realization, very little changed in how information was shared – until now.

This year, the shift was as simple as presenting a clear visual slide at a district-wide meeting, followed by immediate action from site leadership. My site administrator took that slide, printed copies, and placed one in every teacher’s mailbox. We didn’t just hear the goals once in a crowded multipurpose room; we were given direct, permanent access to them.

Naturally, a piece of paper on a desk or posted next to a desk can easily get lost in the shuffle of daily classroom life. But knowing the administration, those goals won’t sit forgotten in a folder; they will be referenced, revisited, and integrated into teachers’ work throughout the year.

Will this clear communication actually make a difference? Educational research unequivocally says yes (Hattie). When a district aligns its staff around clear, actionable priorities – like our current focus on a new writing plan and expanding standards-based learning – it builds collective efficacy. We stop operating in isolated silos and start moving in the same direction, equipped with a common language and a shared point of reference.

As we kick off another school year, I’m curious about your experience: Does your district or school have clearly communicated goals this year, or are you still trying to guess the target?

Balancing Summer Break and School Communication

AdminLeave a comment

As July winds down, a familiar shift begins across the country. Teachers are starting to mentally shift toward the new school year, ordering supplies, sketching out classroom setups, or just enjoying those final, precious quiet mornings.

Behind the scenes, though, our school buildings have been humming with activity all summer. A huge shout-out goes to our maintenance and custodial crews who work tirelessly in the heat cleaning, repairing, and prepping facilities. The same goes for our office staff, secretaries, cafeteria teams, and site administrators who are already deep in the logistics of scheduling, hiring, and organizing. It takes a massive, dedicated team to get a school ready to welcome hundreds of students and staff back through the doors.

With all that prep work in full swing, an interesting seasonal observation always pops up right around this time: the arrival of the first Back To School communications.

We all know the essential information needs to go out at some point: when teachers can access their classrooms, bell schedules, dates for initial professional development, and general orientation details. But as I listen to colleagues across various districts, it brings up some interesting questions about the timing, frequency, and psychological impact of summer communication.

How much communication should schools or districts disseminate while staff is still contractually on summer break? And when is the ideal time to hit “send”?

There seem to be two very different approaches out there:

On one hand, you have the “one-and-done” approach: an email sent roughly two weeks prior to the start date containing the foundational, confirmed details teachers need to plan their return. It’s concise, predictable, and respects the remaining days of break.

On the other hand, there is the “real-time stream” approach: communications starting 2 to 2.5 weeks out, rapidly building to multiple emails a day as new details trickle into the office.

Often, these frequent communications include a thoughtful disclaimer from administration: “It’s still summer break, please don’t feel obligated to read or respond to this now!”

While the intent behind that disclaimer is genuinely kind and meant to relieve pressure, it often creates an unintended mental paradox for teachers. If an email lands in your inbox, human nature kicks in. We wonder: If I don’t need to read it, why was it sent now? Is there something urgent I’m missing? What is the unwritten expectation here? Even if we choose not to open it, the notification itself pings our mental workspace, pulling a little piece of our mind out of “recharge mode” and back into work mode.

Furthermore, when information is sent out rapid-fire, it inevitably leads to the dreaded follow-up email: “Correction: Please disregard the previous message regarding…”

Administrators are under immense pressure, often managing shifting district mandates, late staffing changes, and master schedule puzzles right down to the wire. It is completely understandable why the urge exists to share updates the moment they are finalized. But it leaves me wondering:

  • Could taking a step back, waiting a day or two to let information settle and proofreading it before hitting send, prevent the need for corrective follow-ups altogether?
  • Would batching non-urgent updates into a single, scheduled weekly digest give staff the information they need while preserving their peace of mind?
  • Are we utilizing simple tech features, like scheduled send, to ensure emails land during contract hours rather than on a Sunday afternoon or late July evening?

I don’t bring these questions up to point fingers or call anyone out. Building a healthy, communicative school culture is hard work, and administrators are walking a tightrope between keeping people informed and respecting off-contract time.

My hope is simply that we pause to reflect on how our communication strategies land on the receiving end. By slowing down, batching information, and being intentional with our timing, we can ensure that when that first message arrives, it feels like a helpful roadmap for a great year ahead, not an unintended disruption to a well-deserved break.

What are your thoughts? Which approach works best for you?

Mastery Loops in Math: Redefining Learning with MathReps

AdminLeave a comment

On paper, a MathRep might look exactly like a worksheet. I don’t fight that semantic battle with adult critics because the magic isn’t in the photocopy: it’s in the underlying pedagogy.

Traditional math curricula are inherently topical. They are designed as a fast-paced sprint, checking off one complex skill before immediately jumping to the next. This structure puts students at a massive disadvantage. It forces them to constantly use finite cognitive energy to decode new layouts, instructions, and isolated procedures, leaving little bandwidth to actually master the skills, spot the patterns, and make deep mathematical connections.

If we want students to truly own the math, we have to activate the Mastery Loop. And one of the most powerful ways to do that is by looking at the deliberate design, frontloading strategies, and classroom culture that drive true mathematical fluency.

The Anatomy of a Rep: Moving from Silos to Connections

Traditional worksheets treat math concepts like isolated islands. A student might practice “decimals on a number line” on Monday, but if they don’t see a visual area model or a place value chart alongside it, that knowledge stays siloed. When the format inevitably changes, the student gets stuck because the conceptual bridge was never built.

A MathRep completely flips this dynamic by grouping several interconnected standards onto a single page. By keeping multiple formats of a concept alive simultaneously, you shift the cognitive environment from rote memorization to relational thinking.

This design acts as a real-time diagnostic tool for teachers. Because concrete, pictoral, and abstract representations exist side-by-side, you can immediately spot where a student’s understanding breaks down: Can they partition the area model perfectly, but lose the logic when converting it to the abstract numbers of a standard algorithm? The layout reveals the gap instantly, allowing for precision intervention right in the moment.

The Prior-Grade On-Ramp (Frontloading)

This interconnected design makes MathReps the ultimate engine for frontloading upcoming units. Think about what happens when a fourth-grade teacher hits multi-digit multiplication and more complex division. If students don’t firmly grasp the core meaning of those operations, they get entirely lost in the steps.

Instead of diving straight into a frustrating textbook lesson, you can spend one to two weeks activating their prior knowledge with a past-grade protocol to jog the brain:

  1. The Reminders (3rd Grade): Before opening the current grade-level curriculum, pull a basic third-grade MathRep. For ten minutes a day, students interact with a single, simple equation—mapping out fact families, creating equal groups visually, and skip-counting on a number line. It gently reinforces the core foundation: division is sharing, and multiplication is grouping.
  2. The Transition (4th Grade): Once that foundation is secure, you introduce the fourth-grade MathReps. Because the heavy cognitive lifting of understanding “sharing and grouping” was already handled, their working memory is entirely free to tackle the next layer of complexity: the area model, the distributive property, or tape diagrams.

By utilizing a past-grade protocol, you prove to students that they aren’t starting at zero. You lower their anxiety and provide an active, scaffolded on-ramp to novel standards.

The In-Class Daily Glue vs. The Homework Silo

For this strategy to work, it is critical to note a fundamental rule: MathReps must be done in class. Sending them home for traditional homework completely defeats the purpose.

Traditional math homework is sent home into a feedback vacuum, often forcing students back into the “silo trap” of practicing a single procedure 30 times over. If they have a misconception, they spend half an hour reinforcing a bad habit before an adult can catch it.

MathReps acts as the daily glue because it thrives on a live classroom ecosystem built around immediate feedback. When you establish this routine as a daily norm from day one of the school year, you completely re-engineer the classroom culture:

  • Week 1 (The On-Ramp): On Day 1, the routine might take up to 45 minutes because you are teaching the layout and reducing the extraneous cognitive load together. By Days 2–4, the time drops dramatically (down to 12–15 minutes) as the format becomes predictable. Day 5 serves as a low-stakes baseline assessment.
  • Weeks 2–6 (The Sustainable Machine): Days 1–4 become a predictable rhythm: a set time to work, followed by an immediate check. By Day 5, the weekly assessment is just a natural, stress-free extension of what they’ve already mastered.

Starting every math block with this routine sets a predictable, accessible tone. It warms up their “math brain,” lowers anxiety, and allows them to see the big picture.

Of course, when you move daily practice entirely into the classroom, the inevitable pushback arises: “Then what do teachers give for homework?” The answer lies in moving away from compliance-driven worksheets and toward non-traditional, meaningful alternatives like choice boards. Homework shouldn’t copy what happens in the room; it should extend a student’s vision outward. Instead of solving identical equations at a kitchen table, let them apply their mathematical flexibility to the real world, tracking geometric shapes in local architecture, finding the volume of buildings, or calculating the dimensions of a swimming pool.

Shifting the Ownership Loop

When the daily in-class routine is predictable and the layout never surprises them, you can finally pass the wheel to the students.

If a teacher doesn’t want to spend time curating a “Today’s Number” or “Today’s Equation,” you don’t have to. Assign a different student to choose the mathematical focus each day. When you hand over that marker, the routine stops being an exercise dictated by an adult and becomes a space owned entirely by the kids. They track the patterns, they navigate the constraints, and they build the schemas.

I have watched students actively use a visual representation they completely understand, like an area model in multiplication, to independently check their own work and guide themselves through a complex standard algorithm. They didn’t need a teacher telling them they were right or wrong; the interconnected page allowed them to be guided on their own.

Every time we step back and allow them to navigate the page independently, we honor the core truth of the learning process: The person who is doing the work is the one doing the learning.

My Reflections, Balance is the Key

AdminLeave a comment

This series began with a simple but uncomfortable question: Is tech really the problem, or could it be something else? The teachers care, the students can learn with technology, and technology isn’t inherently bad.

However, the system moved faster than the support.

Across these past few weeks through these posts, we’ve explored how learning science favors retrieval, explanation, and production; how screen use is complex and nuanced; how professional development was often the missing bridge; and how teachers are still finding ways, quietly and creatively, to make learning meaningful within real constraints. It’s not easy, but teachers are doing it.

If there’s one thread that connects it all, it’s this: education doesn’t fail because educators fail. It falters when tools, policies, and expectations lack the support the systems need to sustain them.

Teachers were asked to learn and integrate platforms without pedagogy, manage mandates, and personalize learning without time. And yet, classrooms remain places where curiosity, care, and learning persist. We need to support this with pedagogy and giving time.

This series was never meant to argue for less technology or more technology. It was meant to argue for better use, grounded in research, shaped by pedagogy, and tempered by reality. Balance doesn’t come from extremes. It comes from thoughtful choices, small shifts, and shared responsibility.

Let me leave you with some final thoughts of hope.

Hope lives in teachers who start small.
Hope lives in students who explain their thinking.
Hope lives in leaders who listen before they buy or jump to a new mandate.

And hope lives in the understanding that change doesn’t require perfection: it requires intention.

If this series sparks conversation, reflection, or even quiet validation for someone navigating these tensions, then it has done its job.

A final question: What if we centered learning over tools, trends, or timelines? What could education become?

What Teachers Can Do Now (Without Burning Out)

AdminLeave a comment

Post 5 in the Teaching in a Digital Age series. See previous post.

After research, reflection, and hard truths, the question many teachers are left with is a simple one:

What can I actually do, right now, without adding more to my plate?

It’s the question we are often asking ourselves. This post isn’t about sweeping reform or perfect implementation. It’s about small, realistic shifts that rebalance technology use, protect teacher energy, and put learning back where it belongs: with students. As they say, the person doing the work is the person who is learning.

Start With Choice Boards (Without Overthinking Them)

If you’ve read my blog long enough, you know that I am a fan of choice boards. But choice boards don’t have to be complicated or beautifully designed. In fact, many teachers already use a version of them without calling them that: a “must do” and “may do” list.

A simple way to begin, and what I do:

  1. Choose the skill you want students to practice or master.
  2. List familiar ways students can show understanding (write, draw, explain, build, record).
  3. Decide how students will share—digitally or not.

That’s it. I’m a fan of having students share their work, not just turn it in.

The focus stays on skills and mastery, not the tool. Technology becomes an option, not the driver. A student might choose to draw a model, make a poster, record an explanation, design a game, or write a short reflection. Over time, these low-tech options can naturally lead to digital creation, but only when it makes sense.

Choice builds ownership. Ownership builds engagement.
And none of this requires a new platform (unless you want one).

Lean Into Student Explanation

It’s easy to feel like there’s no time for student talk. There’s content to cover. Pacing to manage. Standards to meet. It all can feel overwhelming at times.

But explanation, oral, visual, or written, isn’t extra.
It is the learning. I know it sounds simple, and the time can feel like extra, but it’s really not. Remember: start small.

Short, structured opportunities for students to explain their thinking, turn-and-talks, quick presentations, sketch-notes, and exit explanations, strengthen understanding and surface misconceptions faster than silent work ever could.

These practices also align naturally with ELD standards, but they benefit all students. Being able to explain clearly, listen actively, and respond thoughtfully is a skill worth protecting instructional time for. And when a student can explain the material clearly, you know they understand it.

Sometimes the most powerful move is simply to stop and let students talk.

Build Simple Routines That Shift the Cognitive Load

When students know:

  • where to find materials
  • what success looks like (success criteria or proficiency scales)
  • how to make choices
  • where finished work goes

…the cognitive load shifts from the teacher to the learner.

This isn’t about losing control; it’s about creating systems that run themselves. As an instructional coach, I have found that having systems in place is valuable for teachers. It lowers your stress and makes for a more peaceful classroom. Once expectations are clear and routines are established, students work more independently, collaborate more naturally, and take greater responsibility for their learning.

That shift frees you up to do what matters most: conference, observe, intervene, and support students who need it most.

You already do much of this instinctively. The key is being intentional and letting go just enough. And if you are thinking to yourself, “I already do all of this,” then you should feel validated.

Start Small (Really Small)

This might be the hardest part.

Teachers are learners. We read blogs, attend conferences, watch webinars, and leave inspired. The temptation to do all the things is real. I am one of those who want to do all of the things right away.

But change works best when it’s edited. And I get it, I have trouble editing. But here are some things I have learned and would like to share with you.

Choose one shift:

  • One new routine
  • One way students explain
  • One choice opportunity

Let students become comfortable. Let yourself adjust. Once it’s working, then layer in something new.

Doing too much too fast overwhelms students and teachers alike. Sustainable change is slow, and that’s not a flaw. It’s the point.

Where MathReps and EduProtocols Fit

Strategies like MathReps and EduProtocols fit naturally into this work, not as mandates, but as examples.

They emphasize:

  • showing thinking over choosing answers
  • explanation as learning
  • repeatable routines that reduce planning load – This is probably the biggest bonus.

Used thoughtfully, they can support production without requiring perfection or constant novelty. But they’re options, not requirements. What matters most is the principle behind them: students actively making sense of their learning.

A Final Thought

You don’t need a new platform. (And if you’re like me, you want the newest, shiniest tool)
You don’t need a complete overhaul.
You don’t need to do more.

You need permission—to start small, to focus on thinking, and to build a classroom that works for you and your students.

That’s where balance begins.

So, what is one low-lift shift you could try this week that moves students from consuming to producing, without adding to your workload?

Was Professional Development the Missing Piece?

Admin2 Comments

This is part 4 in my series about the impact of technology on education. The previous post regarding research was profound. If you would like to read the whole series, you can start with Part 1, which provides an overview before subsequent posts dive deeper into the nuances.

What if the problem was never the tool, but the lack of sustained support? Or support from the onset?

For years, classrooms have been flooded with platforms, programs, and promises. New tools arrive with excitement, urgency, and often good intentions. Teachers are (sometimes) trained briefly, then sent back to their classrooms to “make it work.” Sometimes there is no training, and expected to “make it work”. When outcomes fall short, frustration follows. Fingers point in every direction.

But perhaps the most honest explanation is also the least controversial: we asked educators to transform instruction without giving them the time, space, or support to truly learn how to do so.

One-Time PD vs. Sustained Learning

Most teachers recognize this pattern immediately.

A new tool is introduced. There’s a short training – here’s what it does, here’s where to click – and then: Go use it. Sometimes there’s follow-up, but it’s often months later and/or focused narrowly on features, not instruction. Other times, PD becomes so repetitive that it feels disconnected from classroom reality.

The spacing matters, just like it matters with our students. When training sessions are too far apart, teachers naturally fill in the gaps themselves. They figure out what works (and what doesn’t) through trial, error, and time; often without a shared pedagogical vision guiding those decisions.

Add to that the reality that many schools roll out multiple new tools or curriculum adoptions at once, sometimes with little dedicated time at the start of the year to learn them deeply. And sometimes there’s too much information coming at the beginning of the school year. The result isn’t resistance, it’s overload.

There has to be a better way.

Pedagogy Must Come First: We Can’t Pretend the Clock Rewinds

In theory, most educators agree: pedagogy should come before platforms, curricula, and pacing.

In practice, that train has already left the station long ago.

Teachers are knee-deep in platforms that were adopted years ago. Pedagogy often became secondary, not because educators didn’t care, but because survival required learning to manage the tool with students in the classroom in real time before reflecting on how it shaped instruction.

So the question isn’t Should pedagogy come first?
It’s How do we re-center pedagogy now, given where we are?

One possible answer isn’t adding more tools, but pressing pause. Limiting new adoptions. Creating space for a pedagogical reset using the platforms already in place. Asking not What else do we need? But how can we use what we have better? Or how can I use what is already available? How will it help me/my students?

This isn’t easy. It can feel overwhelming. But if the goal is student thinking, understanding, and transfer, not just task completion or student compliance, then the work is necessary.

What Meaningful Tech PD Actually Looks Like

I know, this is a loaded question. We want it, we know we need it, but are often loath to attend, myself included. This is especially true when it’s district-provided. Why is that? (That was more of a question to myself, no sarcasm, just a real thought/question)

If professional development is meant to change classroom practice, it must be manageable, relevant, and immediately useful.

That starts with focus. If a district introduces three new tools, meaningful PD might center on just one—and even then, on one or two high-leverage instructional uses, not every feature. Depth matters more than breadth. I’m a fan of showing how it is relevant to you, right now.

PD also needs to be differentiated. Some teachers are ready to explore advanced applications. Others need a strong foundation. Meeting teachers where they are isn’t a luxury; it’s how learning works. The trick is to do this well. I’m not sure what the answer is, but I know it should be a goal.

And perhaps most importantly: teachers need to be able to use what they learn immediately. I am passionate about this point. If something isn’t implemented within a week, it often never will. This isn’t a failure of commitment; it’s the reality of teaching in a system filled with mandates, assessments, and competing priorities.

Ongoing support matters too. Not once a semester. Not when schedules allow. Consistent coaching, collaboration, and feedback help teachers refine their practice at a pace that feels sustainable rather than rushed.

Teachers invest in what moves their students forward. When the impact is visible, the motivation follows.

The Cost of Not Investing in Teacher Learning

When professional learning is shallow or fragmented, classrooms tend to drift toward extremes. Again, this isn’t a criticism of teachers; it’s a reality.

In some cases, technology becomes a digital babysitter, students consume, click, and complete without deep thinking. That’s the compliance factor. In others, technology is avoided altogether. Of the two, opting out may be the more responsible choice, but it still leaves potential untapped.

A middle ground exists.

When teachers are supported in learning how and why to use tools, technology can amplify good pedagogy rather than replace it. Tools that provide immediate feedback, surface misconceptions, or help analyze student thinking, like Snorkl or Wayground, can lighten the instructional load while keeping learning active and visible. I know I keep bringing up these two tools. They are ones I have available in my district. There are other tools that achieve the same things.

But even the best tools can’t compensate for a lack of investment in teacher learning.

A Shared Responsibility

This isn’t about blame. We are where we are, and reflection is necessary.

Teachers didn’t ask for constant change without time to adapt. Administrators didn’t design systems to overwhelm. Policymakers didn’t intend to sideline pedagogy. Everyone involved is operating within constraints and doing what they feel is best.

But if we want classrooms where students think, explain, and truly understand, then professional learning can’t be an afterthought. It has to be central to how we implement change.

Teachers and students deserve better than “I have to do this.”
We’ve tried that. It doesn’t work. It’s time we try something different.

So, my question to you is, if professional development were designed around learning rather than compliance, what would change, for teachers, for students, and for the system as a whole?

Coming Next:
If professional learning is the bridge between research and practice, the final question remains: what does balance actually look like in real classrooms? In the next post, we’ll step back to examine what sustainable, thoughtful technology integration can, and should, feel like for teachers and students.

Celebrating Creative Teaching Techniques in Classrooms

AdminLeave a comment

One of the things I love most about my role as an instructional coach/tech TOSA (Teacher on Special Assignment) is the opportunity to visit all the elementary sites in our district. Each school has its own rhythm and energy, and every teacher brings something special to the table. I get to see it all – the creative ideas, the quiet moments of connection, and the unique ways teachers make their classrooms feel like home for their students.

For example, at one school, a teacher sets out a small chalkboard outside her classroom each day. On it, she writes a Joke of the Day – something silly and lighthearted, but always guaranteed to get a few smiles and spark conversation. (Today’s joke: “What do you call rotten eggs, rotten fruit, and spoiled milk in a bag? Gross-eries!”) I love how she’s zhuzhed up the board, complete with a festive skeleton and a splash of color. It’s such a small thing, but it builds community and connection.

Another teacher has found a meaningful way to help students express themselves through emoji writing. I’m still learning exactly how she structures it, but I know students get the chance to write about their thoughts and feelings, and share them if they choose. It’s such a beautiful example of using something familiar and fun to help students build emotional awareness and voice.

Then there’s a teacher at another site who’s rethinking her approach to reading. She’s diving into novel studies, aligning them to the standards while keeping student engagement and learning front and center. It’s exciting to see teachers continually reflect, innovate, and take risks for the sake of their students.

Every week I’m reminded that innovation in education doesn’t always come from big changes—it’s often found in the small, thoughtful touches teachers bring to their classrooms.

The teachers in our district are doing amazing things every single day. I feel incredibly lucky to have a front-row seat to their creativity and care. One of my favorite parts of my job is being able to share these ideas, anonymously, of course, across the district. When I visit another site and a teacher says, “I’ve been wanting to try something new; any ideas?” I get to say, “Actually, I saw someone doing something really neat…”

I love this perk of my job. I love celebrating great teaching and helping ideas spread from one classroom to another. Because when we share, we all grow, and our students benefit most of all. And if you know me, you know that I’m a chronic over-sharer!

Your turn: What’s something small but meaningful you’ve seen or done in a classroom that builds connection or joy? Share it in the comments or with a colleague—it might just spark an idea that makes someone else’s classroom shine a little brighter.

Public Education: More Than a Viral Post

AdminLeave a comment

Lately, it feels like my social media feed has been sprinkled with negative takes on teachers and public education. Over the summer, I noticed an uptick in posts that painted educators in an unflattering light. Some parents shared that they didn’t want to purchase back-to-school supplies, suggesting that the teachers should go buy them themselves or go to donation drives and do the legwork themselves. Others shared stories of classrooms that weren’t ‘cute enough’ or didn’t have rugs, implying that the lack of decoration somehow reflected poorly on the teacher – “how dare they not make the room perfect for my child.”

And then there are the posts about rules and policies – things like cell phone bans in classrooms that teachers have no control over. In some cases, parents have gone as far as encouraging their children to disobey those rules, placing teachers in an impossible position.

Viral posts don’t tell the whole story of public education: our communities do.

I’ll be honest, when these posts go viral, it can feel disheartening. But here’s the thing: I don’t believe they reflect the majority of families across the United States. Instead, they seem to be part of a louder narrative that seeks to chip away at public education and those who dedicate their lives to it. And this is a problem.

The truth is, public education is one of the cornerstones of our country. It has always been, and should always be, a place where every child has access to learning, growth, and opportunity. Funding cuts at every level – from Kinder through universities – have made the work harder, but the mission remains the same: serving students and setting them up for future success.

And here’s the good news: in my community, I see something different from what goes viral. I’m sure you do too. I see families who send their students to school with supplies. I see kindness, collaboration, and a shared commitment to doing what’s best for kids.

That’s the story we need to remember and share. Viral posts may grab attention, but they don’t represent the heart of our communities. Let’s not fall prey to negativity; there’s already too much of that. Instead, let’s lift up the good, celebrate the work being done, and continue to build strong schools for our students. They deserve the best, no matter their zip code.

Because in the end, when we support public education, we’re not just supporting teachers, we’re investing in our children and in the future we all share.

Navigating Adult Cliques: Cultivating Kindness in Schools

AdminLeave a comment

The idea that cliques exist as an adult is weird. Don’t get me wrong, I get that there are people I would rather hang out with, but being cliquish about it is a whole other thing.

This is one of the many thoughts I have as I prepare to return to school. As educators, we strive to instill kindness in our students. We teach them that while they may not get along with everyone, it is important to be kind; inviting peers to play at recess, greeting one another, and engaging with those who are alone are essential actions. However, when we step into the teachers’ lounge, the reality often reflects a different story. Sadly, many can relate to this experience.

As an adult, I have observed cliques, exclusion, and unkind behaviors, which is perplexing. We should strive to be kind to everyone. If we advocate for inclusion, we must also practice it. If we promote equality, we should embody it. When we discuss kindness and compassion, it is essential to implement these values in our daily lives.

As we approach the new school year, it’s important to reflect on our community. This transition brings new teachers, some of whom may be unfamiliar with their surroundings or have just moved to the area for their new positions. In this spirit, let us practice kindness and inclusivity by inviting everyone to join us at our tables. A simple smile or a friendly greeting in passing can truly brighten someone’s day.

One final thought. Many years ago, Ed Campos talked about ways to include others and bring them into our circles. He focused on doing this at conferences. He shared his idea when standing around and talking to others: leave a space open for others to join. Having a closed circle is uninviting, but by leaving a space, that circle is open and inviting. So, I guess I’m drawing inspiration from Ed; leave a space for others to join, you never know what greatness is out there.

Engaging Kids in Math: Using Play-Doh for Multiplication

AdminLeave a comment

This school year, I have had the privilege of collaborating with several 3rd-grade teachers. During one meeting, I shared an innovative idea from a 4th-grade teacher, Ben Cogswell. He introduced the use of Play-Doh to help his students understand multiplication through hands-on activities. I really like how he incorporated MathReps into this lesson. In the accompanying image, you can see students recording their findings in a MathReps, along with an instructional video they can reference for guidance.

Students using Play-Doh and MathReps to assist in their understanding of Multiplication and Division.

Fast forward a few months into 3rd-grade. While meeting with one of the groups, one teacher, Jensen Hall, was excited to share that she had purchased some Play-Doh for her students to use as they begin learning about multiplication. Then, about a week later, she sends me this message with images:

Message: I meant to send this to you earlier but I'm so excited about it I had to make sure I didn't forget again (sorry it's after hours). I introduced multiplication today using the play doh and it was a massive success! Such a great idea you shared!!
Students showing off their work.

Taking a closer look at the image, the red arrow points to where a student wrote out the problem on their desk. Using equal sets, students were able to model how to solve the problem. While the faces have been hidden, I can assure you that they were all smiling and clearly having a good time.

We all want our students to be excited and engaged with math. In the rush to fit everything into a school day—assessments, end-of-the-year testing, and much more—we often forget how to make learning fun and hands-on. Starting with concrete models is essential when teaching new skills like multiplication. Taking the time to begin with concrete models will ultimately save us time later and allow students to truly understand these foundational skills, setting them up for future success.

The story and images have been shared with permission from the teacher.