Ditch the C.U.B.E.S. Strategy in Math

First of all, I want to acknowledge the tremendous impact of Robert Kaplinsky’s insights, which have resonated with many for years. His thought-provoking posts “Is Problem Solving Complex or Complicated?” and “Why Do We Have Word Problems?” are invaluable resources. Today, I want to not only express my appreciation for Kaplinsky’s work but also highlight an alternative strategy to the C.U.B.E.S. approach. We can broaden our problem-solving toolset by exploring new perspectives, and I believe this strategy will further enhance our problem-solving skills. Don’t miss out on the original posts: Is Problem Solving Complex or Complicated? and Why Do We Have Word Problems?.

This image shows what the acronym C.U.B.E.S. represents. Many teachers use this to teach an easy way for students can begin to tackle word problems. I, in fact, had an anchor chart displaying this very technique many years ago. As the saying goes, “Know better, do better.” I now know better and therefore do better. I know you might be asking yourself, “Okay, but I still don’t get why this isn’t ideal?”


Let’s consider the problem to the right. With our adult brains, we understand that it is a two-step problem. We understand we need to add the adults and children together and then subtract the number of males who were in attendance. Now imagine your 8-year-old self reading this and not yet having reading mastered let alone the comprehension skills to decode what is being asked. (Okay, maybe that was just me and my learning disability) You can see that I also went through the CUBES strategy. I circled the numbers, underlined the question, boxed keywords, and got rid of extra information. Arguably, the statement that everyone showed up might also be considered extra information to a young learner. An 8-year-old will start the CUBES process. They will look at the boxed words to find out what operation they need to use. And this is where we run into our first problem. It only says, “How many.” It doesn’t say, “how many more,” or “how many less.” Being around kids, we know that their default is to add. So what are they going to do? You guessed it, add 12, 25, and 15. Even if the question that is underlined is: How many females were there? chances are students are still going to add it all up because they are specifically looking for keywords like ‘in all’, ‘altogether’, ‘less’, ‘more’, etc.

Years ago, I used to teach my elementary students these strategies, as it was what I knew at the time. However, as I learned better strategies to help students, one of my favorite methods became the 3-Read Protocol. You can find more information about it in the blog post Mastering Mathematical Language Routine 6: Three Reads. This approach helps students concentrate on understanding the story, identifying units and quantities, and focusing on the question or task. By following the 3-Read Protocol, students can comprehend the context, which enables them to think critically instead of simply focusing on a procedure that may or may not work.

Finally, to help students effectively apply the information from the story, I highly recommend integrating MathReps into your classroom. MathReps are strategically practiced sets of skills that allow students to practice basic math concepts in similar skill clusters and receive immediate feedback. This approach promotes automaticity and fluency, freeing students to focus on what is needed rather than both what to do and how to do it. You can delve deeper into MathReps by reading a series of blog posts. I suggest starting with The Power of MathReps.

Mastering Mathematical Language Routine 2: Collect and Display

In the previous post, we delved into the significance of the Mathematical Language Routine 1 (MLR 1) “Stronger and Clearer Each Time.” MLR 1 focuses on nurturing a deeper understanding of mathematics by encouraging students to thoughtfully articulate their thinking process, either individually or in groups. Through explanation and attentive listening, students refine their writing skills and strive to explain concepts at a more profound level, akin to mathematicians.

Mathematical Language Routine 2: Collect and Display

Now, let’s turn our attention to MLR 2, known as “Collect and Display.” The primary objective of MLR 2 is to capture the oral language utilized by students during discussions, creating a valuable reference for later use. This capturing process encompasses various forms, including words, diagrams, and images. By collecting and displaying this language-rich content, MLR 2 aids students in establishing connections between different mathematical concepts, as well as facilitating the integration of academic language into their understanding and expression. Additionally, MLR 2 provides immediate feedback, an essential element in student learning, and offers a structured framework for self-reflection and language usage. Join along as we explore MLR 2 further in this post.

The focus of this routine is to collect students’ thoughts using verbal, pictorial, and diagrammatic representations. Although visuals play a role, they are not the main focus. The purpose is to explain the importance of using visual aids to collect and showcase student ideas in mathematics.

This routine aims to stabilize the ever-changing language used by students so that their own output can serve as a reference in developing their mathematical language. The teacher actively listens and records the language employed by students during discussions, whether it’s in pairs, small groups, or the entire class. This includes capturing written words, diagrams, and pictures.

The collected output can be organized, restated, or connected to other language in a display that all students can refer to, build upon, and make connections with during future discussions or writing activities. Throughout the unit, teachers can use the displayed language as a model, update and revise the display as student language evolves, and create connections between student language and new disciplinary language.

This routine provides valuable feedback to students, enhancing their understanding while simultaneously fostering their awareness of language.

When it comes to collecting data during student discussions in math class, there are effective strategies to encourage students to represent their mathematical thinking visually. One popular approach is incorporating Number Talks, a practice already utilized by many teachers. During Number Talks, teachers can record their methods and thoughts, which not only helps them make connections but also allows for discussions about the most efficient approaches. However, it’s important to note that sometimes students may overcomplicate their solutions to showcase the flexibility of their thinking. To address this, scribing these methods can help students realize the value of efficiency. Apart from Number Talks, there are other strategies to encourage visual representation of mathematical thinking. Teachers can introduce visual organizers like graphic organizers or mind maps, which help students organize and illustrate their ideas. Additionally, utilizing tools such as virtual or physical whiteboards or digital sketching apps can enable students to visually capture their thought processes. Activities like creating diagrams or pictures also enhance the collection of student ideas in a visual format, providing teachers with valuable insights into student understanding and promoting deeper mathematical thinking.

The method of collecting student data can vary depending on the teacher’s preference. Some teachers may opt for traditional methods like chart paper, prominently displayed in the classroom. Others may choose digital tools like Padlet. Regardless of the chosen method, the collected data will be easily accessible to students whenever they need it. It is encouraged for students to utilize these records when expressing their thoughts, whether orally or in writing. As a teacher, it is important to highlight this resource for students and demonstrate how to effectively utilize it.

In conclusion, we have explored the significance of MLR 2: “Collect and Display” in fostering effective language students use to communicate their mathematical thinking. This routine has proven to be a valuable tool for students, as it allows them to actively engage with mathematical concepts and communicate their ideas effectively. By collecting and displaying their thinking, students can enhance their understanding and learn from their peers. Moving forward, we will delve into MLR 3: “Critique, Correct, and Clarify” in our next blog post. Stay tuned as we continue to explore the power of Mathematical Language Routines in promoting mathematical discourse and deepening conceptual understanding.

Enhancing Math Discourse: Introducing the ‘Mastering Mathematical Language Routines’ Series

Unleash the Power of Mathematical Language: Introducing the Game-Changing 8 Routines

Calling all educators! Prepare to embark on a transformative educational journey unlike any other. I am thrilled to bring you a powerful series on Mathematical Language Routines – the game-changers that will revolutionize your math classroom. Crafted by the brilliant minds at Stanford University and wholeheartedly adopted by the esteemed CA Department of Education in the newly adopted 2023 Math Frameworks, these routines are set to redefine the way we teach and learn mathematics.

But what exactly are these Mathematical Language Routines? There are eight carefully designed techniques that provide a powerful framework for enhancing language acquisition in the context of mathematical learning. These routines have proven to be instrumental in bridging the gap between mathematics and language, ensuring that students develop a deep understanding of both. Throughout this captivating series, we will delve into each routine, unpacking their unique benefits and offering practical guidance on how to implement them effectively in your classroom.

In this series, we will delve into 8 Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs) that can effortlessly enhance your math classroom experience, no matter the age group you teach. Let’s start with

MLR 1: Stronger and Clearer Each Time – In this routine, students write and share their responses to math problems verbally. They eagerly listen to valuable feedback, which further enriches and refines their responses.

MLR 2: Collect and Display – As students explain their thoughts and processes, the teacher captures the language they use. This serves as a helpful tool for further clarification.

MLR 3: Critique, Correct, and Clarify – Think of this as an in-depth analysis of errors to enhance learning.

MLR 4: Information Gap – Students form two groups, each with partial information, and must collaborate to solve a problem by obtaining the missing pieces of information.

MLR 5: Co-Craft Questions and Problems – Here, students generate questions and problems based on real-life scenarios, akin to the engaging nature of 3-Act Math Tasks.

MLR 6: Three Reads – This routine involves reading a problem three times, each time with a specific purpose. It is particularly effective for dissecting story or word problems.

MLR 7: Compare and Connect – Students compare, discuss, and connect their understandings with those of their peers.

MLR 8: Discussion Supports – Supportive sentence frames, thoughtfully organized into categories, can enhance students’ participation in discussions.

Get ready to embark on an exciting journey that will revolutionize your teaching practice. Together, we will explore the immense potential of these MLRs, empowering you to unleash the true capabilities of your students in mathematics and beyond. Over the past two years, I have gathered a wealth of knowledge in this area, and I can’t wait to share it with you. Join me as we dive into this exhilarating series, equipping you with the tools and skills to excel, ensuring your students’ success. Come back for more captivating insights that will leave you inspired and eager for the next installment.

3 Reads Protocol

The “3 Reads Protocols” is a highly effective technique among the 8 Mathematical Language Routines. This strategy encourages a comprehensive understanding of word problems through a structured approach. In this activity, the problem is read three times, but it entails more than simple repetition. During the first read, the focus lies on comprehending the problem’s narrative. To aid in this process, teachers often conceal quantities and questions, enabling students to concentrate on comprehension rather than immediately diving into mathematical calculations. In the second read, teachers reveal the hidden quantities, redirecting students’ attention towards analyzing these values and their associated units, consequently deepening their grasp of the problem’s context. The final read diverges into two possible paths. If a question is provided, it is read aloud, and students formulate a strategic plan to tackle it. Alternatively, if no question is given, students are prompted to generate a list of inquiries themselves. Personally, I advocate for the latter approach, as it not only boosts student engagement but also fosters natural differentiation. In this scenario, students select a question from the generated list to solve. Remarkably, I have seldom witnessed students opting for an easy way out; rather, they frequently rise to the challenge by choosing appropriately challenging questions for themselves.

Today I was able to visit a 3rd-grade classroom in which the teacher was practicing this routine with their students. The teacher began by accessing the students’ prior knowledge about squirrels. The teacher then read the story (minus quantities) to the students. With partners, they discussed what the story was about. This can be hard for some students in the beginning. They know it’s math and naturally start looking for problems to solve. The students went through the steps and enjoyed themselves. After generating a list of questions, the group decided to answer the same question: How many acorns did each squirrel carry to get the pile of 24 acorns?

The struggle began as the teacher and I observed the students grappling with the task. We decided to give them some time to develop their own strategies before intervening. Many of them struggled to find a clear direction. Some counted the number of acorns squirrels can carry, reaching a total of 10. However, they seemed unsure about what to do next. Sensing the need for guidance, we asked the students to explain their thinking process. It was at that moment when a student appeared to have a promising approach. We asked him to elaborate on his reasoning. With a little clarification, he successfully explained that the black squirrel carried 15 acorns, while the gray squirrel carried 9 acorns. Surprisingly, the student didn’t mention the brown squirrel; technically, it carried 0 acorns. Another student followed suit and broke it down in a slightly different manner:

BrownBlackGray
253
253
121
Taking it one trip at a time

Doing it this way, the student was able to organize their thoughts and solve the problem in smaller chunks. At this point, we stopped the class to celebrate some early successes. With permission from the students, we shared each strategy pointing out how they are different yet correctly answered the question. By having the students explain their thoughts and showcasing some strategies this allowed struggling students to begin making sense of how to begin to tackle solving the problem. While some students still struggled others found similar strategies and were able to begin solving the problem.

The students agreed that this task was difficult, but fun. From our perspective, the students were engaged. As this was not the first time that students had experienced this, we can see small gains being made in the area of word problems. This is a protocol that the teacher plans to continue to use throughout the year.

8 Mathematical Language Routines

I have been on a journey to educate myself on the 8 Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs). While they were designed with Multilanguage Learners in mind, I find that they are just good teaching. So what are they?

  • Stronger & clearer each time
  • Collect & display
  • Clarify, critique, and correct
  • Information Gap
  • Co-craft questions
  • 3 Reads
  • Compare & Connect
  • Discussion Supports

So what does each one entail? Well, rather than sit and explain, I’d rather give you a resource that does a far better job breaking it down. It’s also one of my favorite resources.

Part of my deep dive allowed me to align Math EduProtocols and these MLR’s. Doing this has my mind working on how to incorporate more MLR’s within Math EduProtocols.

With all this in mind, I have begun to curate some resources for teachers. I break down each MLR and give links to activities. It’s not a comprehensive list, so I will continue to add to it as I find more. If you have something that should be added to the document, let me know!