Mastering Mathematical Language Routine 8: Discussion Supports

Looking back at the series of Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs) we have explored, we can see that their collective aim is to foster robust mathematical discussions and enhance language proficiency among students. These routines serve diverse purposes, such as refining ideas through structured conversation (Stronger and Clearer Each Time), stabilizing oral language as a reference (Collect and Display), refining written arguments through critique (Critique, Correct, and Clarify), promoting collaborative problem-solving through information sharing (Information Gap), empowering students to craft mathematical questions (Co-Craft Questions and Problems), facilitating comprehension and negotiation of math texts (Three Reads), and encouraging comparison and connection between various mathematical approaches and representations (Compare and Connect). Together, these MLRs not only elevate student participation and conversation but also cultivate meta-awareness of language, fostering a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts.

We conclude this series with Mathematical Language Routine 8: Discussion Supports. The goal is to foster inclusive discussions in math by combining multi-modal strategies that aid in understanding complex language, ideas, and classroom communication. These strategies encourage student participation, conversation, and awareness of language nuances. With continued modeling, the aim is for students to adopt these techniques independently, prompting deeper engagement among peers in discussions.

Having rich mathematical discussions can be challenging, especially when there are barriers that hinder effective communication. Recently, I encountered a situation where I was assisting a student with a math problem. The task was to determine the combination of rolls of coins needed to reach a specific amount. The problem provided information about the rolls of nickels and dimes, including the quantity each roll contained. However, during our discussion, it became evident that the student misunderstood the task. They believed they needed to determine the number of dimes or nickels in each roll, rather than finding the overall combination. To clarify this confusion, I decided to show them an image of a roll of coins and briefly discussed its concept, which helped them grasp the correct approach. This incident highlighted the importance of uncovering and addressing any gaps in background knowledge. It also underscored the significance of reflecting on the relevance of certain questions.

Having sentence frames is not only helpful to me but also to the students. The above image is one that I created based on Illuminate Math‘s suggestions. These sentence frames can guide the class towards deeper thinking and understanding. As mentioned before, the main objective of this routine is to encourage students to take the lead in these discussions. Additionally, it is important to note that this particular routine can be integrated into any of the other Mathematical Learning Routines (MLRs).

This concludes our multi-part series on the 8 Mathematical Routines. I highly encourage you to start implementing these routines in your day-to-day math class. To further support you on this journey, I have gathered a variety of helpful resources, which you can access here. If you have any additional resources to share, please don’t hesitate to reach out. I will gladly add them to the collection and give you proper credit.

Mastering Mathematical Language Routine 5: Co-Craft Questions and Problems

In this ongoing blog series on Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs), we have covered four essential routines so far. Let’s recap their key ideas: MLR 1: “Stronger and Clearer Each Time,” MLR 2: “Collect and Display,” MLR 3: “Critique, Correct, Clarify,” and MLR 4: “Information Gap.” These routines are designed to enhance oral and written communication skills in mathematics. Now, let’s turn our attention to MLR 5: “Co-Craft Questions and Problems,” which offers a unique approach. It encourages students to actively participate in the question and problem-solving process, enabling them to explore mathematical contexts before seeking answers.

In MLR 5, students are given the opportunity to dive deeper into problem-solving by creating, analyzing, and enhancing mathematical questions, problems, and situations. The purpose of this routine is to provide students with a space where they can generate, analyze, and improve their understanding of mathematical concepts, specifically word problems. Through engaging in conversations, students refine their ability to formulate, select, and refine questions, allowing them to develop stronger critical thinking skills. This routine fosters students’ ability to use conversation skills effectively in the process of formulating, selecting, and refining their mathematical questions and problems. By actively participating in these conversations, students take ownership of their learning and become more proficient problem solvers. Curiosity Creator, found in The EduProtocols Field Guide Math Edition, Chapter 18, is one way to practice this routine.

Another excellent routine that can be seamlessly integrated into MLR 5 is the 3-Act Math Task, originally developed by Dan Meyer. This ingenious task involves providing students with minimal information, serving as a catalyst to foster curiosity and encourage them to generate questions that they can later answer with additional information provided in subsequent acts.


The first act, known as Act 1, is designed to stimulate students’ observation skills and curiosity. During this phase, students are encouraged to ponder upon what they notice and wonder about the given scenario. They also formulate questions that they will eventually solve. Act 1 is an opportune moment for students to engage in conversations regarding their observations, estimations ( too high, too low, or actual), a specific focus question, and the type of information they need to answer their own question.


In Act 2, students are provided with the necessary information to solve the problem or question they crafted in Act 1. Armed with this newfound knowledge, they embark upon the solving process.
Finally, Act 3 allows students to review the actual answer and assess whether their initial predictions were correct.

This routine is highly engaging for students across all levels, offering a perfect balance between accessibility and challenge. It also offers a wide range of ready-made, standards-aligned tasks suitable for students from Kindergarten through high school. By incorporating the 3-Act Math Task routine into the classroom, instructors can empower students to actively participate in problem-solving, develop critical thinking skills, and cultivate a deep understanding of the importance of co-constructing problems and questions.

Mastering Mathematical Language Routine 4: Information Gap

Recap of the previous MLR discussions: We have reached the halfway point in the series of Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs). So far, we have explored MLR 1: “Stronger and Clearer Each Time,” where the focus was on enhancing understanding and communication skills through the use of the “Convince Me That” technique. This was followed by MLR 2: “Collect and Display,” which aimed at expanding students’ academic vocabulary. MLR 3: “Critique, Correct, Clarify” was centered around improving both oral and written skills, utilizing the EduProtocol Nacho Problem. Now, let’s introduce MLR 4: “Information Gap,” a personal favorite, which promotes collaborative work and helps students identify critical information necessary for solving word problems. This routine plays a vital role in fostering meaningful interactions and communication in the realm of mathematics.

One of the biggest issues in math classrooms is the challenge of word problems, also known as story problems. These problems require students to go through multiple steps, including reading comprehension, deciphering the question, creating a plan, and solving the problem. However, students often struggle with knowing how to use the given information and which details are relevant to the solution.

To address this problem, Information Gap tasks have been developed to help students navigate this challenge. In these tasks, students are divided into two groups: one group has the data card, while the other group has the problem card.

The group with the problem card reads the problem silently and asks the group with the data card for the information necessary to solve the problem. It’s important that neither group shows their cards to the other. Before sharing the information, the group with the data card asks the problem group why they need that specific information. This process encourages the problem group to justify their reasoning and ensures that they have thoroughly thought out the solution process.

This collaborative process continues until all the required information is obtained. Once both groups have shared their cards, they can work together to solve the problem. The goal of this approach is to create a need for students to communicate and collaborate, as this type of task cannot be accomplished alone.

When starting this process, it is beneficial to demonstrate it to the class. Initially, I present the problem card to the entire class while holding the data card myself. I then instruct students to work in pairs and determine what information they need. They are encouraged to formulate questions to obtain the necessary information and provide a rationale for why they need it. I repeat this process several times until the entire class understands their roles. Gradually, I reduce the group size over time until they are working in pairs to complete this task. This routine helps students to slow down and approach their thinking more deliberately.

In summary, Information Gap tasks are designed to promote collaboration and problem-solving skills among students. By requiring them to share different pieces of information both orally and visually, these tasks facilitate effective communication and enhance their ability to work together towards a solution.

In the upcoming post, we will delve into MLR 5: Co-craft questions, where we explore how 8 P*Arts meets Word Problems, 3-Act Math Task, and Emoji Word Probz perfectly align with this approach. Join us in the next installment of the series to discover exciting examples and techniques that will surely ignite your interest and leave you eager to come back for more. Stay tuned!

Enhancing Math Discourse: Introducing the ‘Mastering Mathematical Language Routines’ Series

Unleash the Power of Mathematical Language: Introducing the Game-Changing 8 Routines

Calling all educators! Prepare to embark on a transformative educational journey unlike any other. I am thrilled to bring you a powerful series on Mathematical Language Routines – the game-changers that will revolutionize your math classroom. Crafted by the brilliant minds at Stanford University and wholeheartedly adopted by the esteemed CA Department of Education in the newly adopted 2023 Math Frameworks, these routines are set to redefine the way we teach and learn mathematics.

But what exactly are these Mathematical Language Routines? There are eight carefully designed techniques that provide a powerful framework for enhancing language acquisition in the context of mathematical learning. These routines have proven to be instrumental in bridging the gap between mathematics and language, ensuring that students develop a deep understanding of both. Throughout this captivating series, we will delve into each routine, unpacking their unique benefits and offering practical guidance on how to implement them effectively in your classroom.

In this series, we will delve into 8 Mathematical Language Routines (MLRs) that can effortlessly enhance your math classroom experience, no matter the age group you teach. Let’s start with

MLR 1: Stronger and Clearer Each Time – In this routine, students write and share their responses to math problems verbally. They eagerly listen to valuable feedback, which further enriches and refines their responses.

MLR 2: Collect and Display – As students explain their thoughts and processes, the teacher captures the language they use. This serves as a helpful tool for further clarification.

MLR 3: Critique, Correct, and Clarify – Think of this as an in-depth analysis of errors to enhance learning.

MLR 4: Information Gap – Students form two groups, each with partial information, and must collaborate to solve a problem by obtaining the missing pieces of information.

MLR 5: Co-Craft Questions and Problems – Here, students generate questions and problems based on real-life scenarios, akin to the engaging nature of 3-Act Math Tasks.

MLR 6: Three Reads – This routine involves reading a problem three times, each time with a specific purpose. It is particularly effective for dissecting story or word problems.

MLR 7: Compare and Connect – Students compare, discuss, and connect their understandings with those of their peers.

MLR 8: Discussion Supports – Supportive sentence frames, thoughtfully organized into categories, can enhance students’ participation in discussions.

Get ready to embark on an exciting journey that will revolutionize your teaching practice. Together, we will explore the immense potential of these MLRs, empowering you to unleash the true capabilities of your students in mathematics and beyond. Over the past two years, I have gathered a wealth of knowledge in this area, and I can’t wait to share it with you. Join me as we dive into this exhilarating series, equipping you with the tools and skills to excel, ensuring your students’ success. Come back for more captivating insights that will leave you inspired and eager for the next installment.